Today, I noticed a Find-a-Grave entry for Robert Francis Tapscott, which gives his parents as "James Tapscott and Susannah Howard Tapscott (nee: Baker)" of Botetourt County. This would be laughable were it not likely to lead to a mass of misinformation and a multitude of erroneous family trees to be passed down from person to person without thought or consideration. The reason that it would otherwise be laughable is that James Tapscott, the husband of Susannah Howard Tapscott died over a decade before Robert Francis was born. Besides, James Tapscott's will, which names all his children and step children, makes no mention of Robert Frances. I would very much like to see a male descendant of Robert Francis Tapscott by an all-male line, take a yDNA test and join the Tapscott Project, but so far I have had no volunteers. Come on. We need you! In the meantime, below is what I have written about Robert Francis Tapscott in the 2nd edition of my book Henry the Immigrant (still a draft). Please forgive some missing endnotes, which do not always come through in these blogs. Note that there is a chance, albeit slim, that Robert was the son of a James Tapscott, but not the James of Botetourt County, rather James E. of Fauquier County. I am still looking into this as well as the possible Baker or Newton Tapscott connection.
The origin of Robert Francis Tapscott, who married Lucy Frances Wood (daughter of Alexander Wood and Elizabeth Kirtley) and whose family and descendants appear in Clarke County, Virginia, censuses beginning in 1850, remains a mystery. Robert is first named in a 4 April 1843 Clarke County record: “James T. [Thomas] Wood made Oath before me Clerk of the Court of the County aforesaid that Lucy F. Wood who is about to intermarry with Robert Tapscott of the County of Fauquier is over twenty One years of age and an inhabitant of this county.” That Robert was from Fauquier County could indicate that he was a child of James and Elizabeth (Percifull) Tapscott, or possibly an illegitimate child of Elizabeth. Robert was born 8 March 1817, the last year that James could have still been living. That a marriage record for Joseph Baker Tapscott, Robert’s oldest son, stated that he and his bride were “colored” might indicate a mixed-race offspring of Elizabeth, who is known to have had such descendants. The 1840 Fauquier County census shows Elizabeth’s household with no white, but several free black males. Note, however, no document other than Joseph Baker Tapscott’s marriage record indicates the possibility of a mixed-race origin.
Clarke County is located near Hampshire and Jefferson Counties, now in West Virginia, where the three sons of James and Susanna (Baker) Tapscott resided. Furthermore, Robert Francis married a Wood, and Susanna Baker’s mother was a Wood, as was her first husband, John. And the middle name of Robert and Lucy’s oldest child was “Baker.” In view of these facts, particularly the middle name “Baker,” Robert Francis Tapscott would appear to be a possible grandson of James Sr. and Susanna—a son of Newton, Baker, or Chichester. (He cannot have been a son of James Sr., who was deceased by 27 February 1807, ten years before Robert Francis was born. But no relationship between Lucy Wood and Judith Howard Wood is known. Moreover, Robert and Lucy were married by Rev. Joseph Baker, for whom their first-born may well have been named. The 1820 Romney, Virginia census shows the Newton Tapscott household with one male child, who has never been identified. Likewise, the 1830 census for Shepherdstown, Virginia, shows the Baker Tapscott family with four male children, but only three sons are known. But the obituary of Newton Tapscott’s widow, Louisa, specifically states that she left only an infant daughter, and the only known marriages of Baker and Chichester occurred years after the birth of Robert Francis Tapscott.
Robert Francis died 24 June 1874 and is buried in Old Chapel Cemetery, Clarke County, Virginia. His wife is said to be buried there also, but no grave is now found.
Hi Robert
ReplyDeleteYou have a fascinating blog! I have traced my maternal line back to Humfrey & Joane Tapscott circa 1650's in Devon - Uffculme, Willand, Kentisbeare, Braodhembury As yet no further than Joane as on the marriage document it just gives Humfrey's marriage and not his spouse surname. In this family line Baker appear twice, so I wondered if your family did originally come from Devon?
I am on the myFTDNA web site as I have taken a DNA test in the hope of finding my Graham grandfather's family. Having learnt it does not show the male line, I appear to have some matches to males on my paternal line where my links are Vowel &Hassell. I also have matches to Cameron, MacCleod in Scotland and close link to Danish lady. The geography of the family appears in Scandinavia, Holland, Switzerland an South West England. On my paternal line we are meant to have Jewish "Stucci" relatives and Mennonites who went to America from Bristol. A right ol' mix!
Just wondered what your thoughts are to Devon and Tapscott?
Best to you Lizzie Bang - Stuckey
First, I would like to invite you to join the FTDNA Tapscott project even though your testing is autosomal. It costs nothing. Joane was a very, very common name for early Tapscotts. When I was doing Tapscott research in England, Joane or Joan was the name I most often found for in early female Tapscotts. The Baker connection is intriguing, but I would be more than a little surprised if somehow or other Bakers left the Devon area only to later connect back up with the Tapscott family almost a century later. As far as connections with Devon, see my new blog dated 13 May 2015.
Delete