Fauquier County Tapscotts - Maria

Harriet had two children—Maria Ann Tapscott, the first born, and Cordelia Tapscott. A third child, John, is sometimes claimed. But John, who appears in an 1860 Fauquier County census with Harriett and Cordelia, was Cordelia’s partner rather than her brother. We will hear more about Cordelia and John in the future. But in this and the next few blogs, we will be looking at Maria and her relatives, an exceedingly complex group of people. Indeed, one could write a single book about Maria and her connections.

Records for both her first and second marriages, show Maria Ann Tapscott, born c1832 according to a weighted average of census data, to be a child of Harriet, but no father is recorded. With a complete absence of evidence, an Eli Penn (also “Pinn”) Tapscott is often claimed to be the father of Maria, and sometimes of her sister, Cordelia. There was an Eli Pinn that lived in Fauquier County at the time and whose sister, Amanda, married Harriet’s half-brother William Tapscott (more on all that later). But that Eli Pinn was born c1823 and would have been a young child when Maria and Harriet were born. No other Eli Penn/Pinn or Eli Tapscott is found in Fauquier County records. We have no evidence of who fathered Maria.

On 6 Apr 1848 in Fauquier County, Maria married John F. Martin. John had been born in Virginia around 1824. A Thomas Martin was a surety for the marriage bond. John and Maria lived out their married life in Fauquier County, where John was first a laborer and then a wheelwright, and where the couple had six known children—Jane E., Virginia A., John Robert. James Henry, Jefferson D., and Louisa.

John Martin died c1863. He is seen in the 1860 census, but when Maria married a second time, to Alfred C. Martin in Fauquier County on 12 Jan 1867, the record showed that she was a widow.

Maria’s second marriage was short, for tragic reasons we shall soon see, but it did result in a child, Carrie. We last see Maria living as a widow 1880 in Cedar Run District with Carrie and the two youngest children from Maria’s first marriage, Jefferson and Louisa.

Eventually we will look at each of Maria’s children, but our next blog is on the ancestry of Maria's husbands. Be prepared to be bored with lots of data and lots of confusing connections.

Fauquier County Tapscotts – Harriet

Harriet Tapscott

We have already taken a detailed look at Harriet, the apparent daughter of James and Elizabeth (Harriet and Harriott). But note that I use the adjective “apparent.” We need to examine Harriet further. But I warn you. This is exceedingly complicated and rather boring.

Harriet was listed as “m” (“mulatto”) in the 1860 census and as “W” (White) in the 1870 census. No race was given for her in the 1850 census. When she died on 12 Aug 1871, her death record listed her as “Colored.” All this is puzzling since Elizabeth and James were both White, at least as far as we can tell. Perhaps Harriet’s race was inaccurately concluded based on the race of her children, but might there have been other reasons? Could her parentage be different than what we believe?

In Harriet’s death register, Cordelia Tapscott, the informant, is named as Harriet’s mother, an obvious error. Or is it? Could another Cordelia have been an unknown consort of James and might Harriet have named one of her daughters after her mother? That would explain a lot. Nevertheless, the only Cordelia Tapscott living at the time, of which we are aware, was the child of Harriet. (Two Cordelia Tapscotts born c1785 and c1814 and shown in a small number of online trees are easily proven fictional.) At this point we need to continue our earlier look at DNA.

The following table contains summaries of selected autosomal DNA matches for three people shown by paper studies to be descendants of Harriet. For reasons of privacy, I am not naming these individuals, who are the only Harriet descendants whose DNA test results I have access to. (Thank you, One, Two, and Three.) Descendant One is believed to be a descendant of only Harriet’s daughter Maria. Descendant Two is a descendant of both of Harriet’s daughters, Maria and Cordelia, by two different lines. And Descendant Three is a descendant of Cordelia, but also of Harriet’s half-brother, Edmond, a child of Elizabeth Percifull by an unknown suitor. It would, of course, be better for DNA interpretation to avoid a person with two entirely different connections to Elizabeth, but one must use what one can get.

The table shows DNA matches between the three descendants of Harriet with three different groups of people. The first group consists of descendants of Henry the Immigrant through lines believed to not involve James, son of Ezekiel Tapscott. The second is people believed to be descendants of Elijah Percifull by routes that involve no Fauquier County Tapscotts. And the third group is Fauquier County descendants of Elizabeth, but not of Harriet. Shown are the number of matches and the average shared DNA. The larger the centimorgan (cM) number, the closer the relationship.

I must admit that the data are questionable because analyses of the matches are based to a large extent on what others have entered into their trees. Nevertheless, the DNA results in the table provide excellent evidence that Harriet was a child of James. The three individuals tested show a total of 19 matches with descendants of Henry the Immigrant, with a particularly large number (nine) for Edney Tapscott, grandfather of Harriet’s father, James. This is very good evidence that James E. Tapscott was Harriet’s father.

On the other hand, at first glance, the data provide only fair evidence that Harriet was a daughter of Elizabeth. There are matches to Percifull descendants, through both Fauquier Tapscott and non-Fauquier lines. Although this is what we would expect if Harriet’s mother was Elizabeth, the evidence is shaky for two reasons. First, one would expect a greater number of matches.  Second, a small, somewhat isolated, community, such as Cedar Grove and Turner's District in Fauquier Co, could result in endogamy or something similar. Multiple relationships might cause Percifull matches resulting from hidden connections, and this would decrease the already small number of meaningful Percifull matches.

But additional data strengthen the conclusion that Harriet was a daughter of Elizabeth. We start with a member of the Holder line, a descendant of Robert Francis Tapscott, believed to be a child of Elizabeth Percifull and a person with the surname “Holder.” That member of the Holder line has, as far as we know, no connections with other Fauquier County Tapscotts than via Elizabeth. The Holder descendant, who has granted me permission to review DNA results, has four matches with people who are descendants of Harriet, but who have no other known connection with Elizabeth. Three of these matches involve lines through both Maria and Cordilla, but one involves only a single line through Cordelia to Harriet, for which there is a match of 9 cM. The Holder descendant is separated from Elizabeth by 5 steps, and the Cordelia descendant, by 6 steps. Thus, there are 13 degrees of separation between the two people descended from their most recent common ancestor, Elizabeth. The Holder and Harriet descendants are fifth cousins once removed. For 13 degrees of separation, we would expect the shared DNA to be 6.64 cM, which is remarkably close to the 9 cM actually observed, considering that the expected range is probably around 0 to 15 cM. Is this proof that Cordelia’s grandmother and Harriet’s mother was Elizabeth Perciful? No. There are too many things that could be wrong, particularly unknown multiple relationships. But it is strong evidence.

The other three matches of the Holder Descendant with individuals believed to be descended from Harriet through both Maria and Cordelia show shared DNA of 39 cM, 35 cM, and 36 cM; however, it is difficult to calculate how much shared DNA is expected when there are multiple relationships. It is admitted, however, that these numbers appear to be higher than expected, which would perhaps be around 13 cM, and that hints of unknown relationship paths.

At this point we are going to say that DNA evidence provides good evidence that Maria and Cordelia were, indeed, children of Harriet and grandchildren of James Tapscott and Elizabeth Perciful. But we would like more data than what are now available.

Are you a Fauquier County Tapscott (i.e., a descendant of Elizabeth Percifull, with or without the name “Tapscott”)? Do you have DNA results (autosomal, mitochondrial, or yDNA) you could share? Sharing would certainly help our Fauquier County Tapscott research, and your identity will not be divulged. If you have DNA test data on or transferrable to FamilyTreeDNA, I encourage you to join the Tapscott Project. If you have DNA data on Ancestry or MyHeritage, please consider sharing them with me (see Ancestry Sharing or MyHeritage Collaboration). (And, of course, I would be quite willing to share my results with you in return, though you would probably find them rather uninformative.) If you have DNA data on GEDmatch, I encourage you to give me your kit number (again, I will do the same for you, if requested). And, finally, I urge males, particularly those with the name "Tapscott," to take a yDNA test and females to take a mitochondrial DNA test. Both tests are available at FamilyTreeDNA though, I admit, they are a rather pricey. (No, I do not get a cut.) To discuss using your DNA test results in research, email me (address below) or leave a comment on this post. Thanks for your help, cousins.

Fauquier County Tapscotts - James and Elizabeth

In our previous blog, we looked at the origins of James E. Tapscott, the progenitor of the genetic Tapscott line of the Fauquier County Tapscotts. Now we need to link him with Elizabeth Percifull, the mother of all the Fauquier Tapscott lines.

When James E. was growing up in Lancaster Co, Virginia, also living there were the Percifulls, who were well acquainted with James’s family. On 17 Apr 1783 Elijah Percifull had secured a bond for the marriage of Susanna Tapscott, Ezekiel’s sister and James’s aunt. And around 1790, Elijah was made the executor of the estate of Joseph Dobbs, who had married Mary Schofield, future sister-in-law of Ezekiel Tapscott’s daughter Polly. Thus, it was inevitable that James Tapscott and Elijah’s daughter Elizabeth, who were about the same age, would meet. And meet they did, for on 20 Dec 1811 in Fauquier County James E. Tapscott obtained a bond to wed Elizabeth “Pearciful,” daughter of Elijah.

It is likely that James and Elizabeth traveled to Fauquier for their marriage to avoid Elizabeth’s father, Elijah, who not only disapproved of his daughter, but also had a poor opinion of James. This can be seen in Elijah's will. The will gives the full names of the husbands of Elijah's three other married daughters:

Judith who intermarried with Thomas Potts . . . Daughter Ruth who into married with William Sims . . . Nancy who intor married with Gideon Marsh

But Elizabeth was listed as

Daughter Betsey who into married with Tapscott

It was almost like Elijah didn’t know James’s name. But of course, he did. And Elijah didn’t want James to get his hands on Elizabeth’s inheritance, what little she got. So, his will states:

there is seven pounds ten Shillings to be Reducted out of my Daughter Betsey proportion for money I paid for her and the balance of her proportion to be in money and paid to her yearly as five pounds a year so long as it will last and the said Tapscott to have no power of the same and if she dies before it is gone the same to Return to the estate

The money Elijah had "paid for her" was Elizabeth's fine for bearing "two bastard children" with Richard Cundiff.

So, at the beginning of 1812, James was on his own in Fauquier County, far from home with a wife and likely a child (Telem) to support. Any inheritance he may have gotten from his father, who died over a decade earlier, had probably been used by James’s guardians for his support. And with a disapproving father, Elizabeth would certainly not be bringing money into the family. All this may explain why on 25 May 1812, less than a month before the start of the War of 1812 and just five months after he had obtained a bond to marry Elizabeth, James enlisted in the U.S. Army for a five-year term. Unlike the militia, the regular Army provided a dependable, though meagre, income.

At the time, the standing U.S. Army was small. When President James Madison and the U.S. Congress declared war with Britain on 18 Jun 1812, the army numbered less than 7000. Most of the War of 1812 was conducted by states’ militias. By war’s end, militias totaled about 470,000 men (in those days, they were all men), while the Army had expanded to just 60,000. Two other James Tapscotts served in the War of 1812, both in the Virginia Militia–James W., the son of Chichester and Betsy Ann Williams Tapscott, and James Jr., son of James Sr. and Elizabeth Davis Tapscott. Both were grandchildren of Capt. Henry Tapscott, brother of Edney, and both were second cousins of James E. Tapscott of Fauquier County. Curious about these other James Tapscotts? Get a copy of Henry the Immigrant, The First Tapscotts of Virginia and look them up.

A bounty land warrant states that James served as a private in the 5th Regiment of Infantry, which was not formed until 3 Mar 1815, after the war’s end. He is also said to have served in the Corps of Artillery, which was formed in May 1814. During his military stint, James likely served in several units.

James died in service, though not in battle or even during the war. His service in the 5th Regiment had to be after the war. James may have died a long ways from home. In 1816, the 5th U.S. Infantry Regiment was stationed in the Upper Midwest of the United States. And he died young, no older than 27. He was deceased by 23 June 1817, when Elizabeth posted a bond in Fauquier County for guardianship of their daughter. He was also shown as deceased when a bounty land warrant was issued in 2 Jul (or 9 Jul, two dates are given) 1817. His death likely occurred in 1816 or 1817.

It was now Elizabeth who was on her own, with soon three kids to support—Telem, Harriet, and Robert Francis. And who was Robert Francis? Wait and see.

 

Fauquier County Tapscotts – The Genetic Line, James E. Tapscott

In the past, we have had some questions and doubts about the origins of the Fauquier County Tapscotts and whether DNA could confirm as a progenitor Elizabeth Percifull and, for some, James E. Tapscott (Fauquier County Tapscotts, Tapscotts and DNA Testing, DNA Testing Once Again). Note that I always use the term “Fauquier County Tapscotts” to mean anyone descended from ancestors who had the name “Tapscott” and who lived in Fauquier County in the first half of the 1800s. I do not mean only people who still bear the Tapscott name. I have recently had a number of breakthroughs that provide rather good DNA evidence indicating that at least some present-day Fauquier County Tapscotts do indeed have as ancestors both James and Elizabeth, and also that some have as an ancestor Elizabeth, but not James. The DNA results are too complicated to publish as a blog at this time, but perhaps they can be combined and simplified sufficiently to allow blogging in the future. But now we can reasonably claim that some Fauquier County Tapscotts are descended from Henry the Immigrant through his great grandson James and James's wife, Elizabeth.

James E. Tapscott (could that be James “Edney” Tapscott?) was the only son of Ezekiel Tapscott. He was also the grandson of Edney and Judith Purcell Tapscott and the great grandson of Henry Tapscott, the Immigrant, and his wife, Ann Edney. The histories of James's antecedents are detailed in the book Henry the Immigrant, The First Tapscotts of Virginia. James was not the source of genes for all the Fauquier Tapscotts, but he was certainly the source of their name.

When Ezekiel died around 1799, James’s uncle John Tapscott Sr. was made guardian for him and his sister Harriott by a Lancaster Co, Virginia, court. Following the 1807 death of his first guardian, James's estate was transferred to John Cundiff Jr., who had been chosen by James as his new guardian on 16 January of that year. Thus, in 1807 James was over 14, since he had chosen his guardian, but was not yet 21, since he had a guardian. James had been born between 1786 and 1793. We will take 1790 as his approximate birth year.

You may have remembered seeing the name “Cundiff” before. James’s second guardian was the uncle of Richard Cundiff, initiator of Elizabeth Percifull’s fall from grace. Or perhaps we should say Richard Cundiff, Elizabeth’s first conquest.

James Tapscott’s lineage, and that of his Fauquier Co. descendants. Most spouses have been omitted from this chart. See Henry the Immigrant, the First Tapscotts of Virginia for details and sources. The direct male line to the Fauquier Tapscotts is shown in yellow.

James’s story thus far has been pre-Elizabethan. Our next blog will be about James’s post-Elizabethan era, starting with his marriage to Elizabeth.

Fauquier County Tapscotts – Telem and Peggy’s Final Three

I wish it were the “Final Four,” which is more alliterative and sporty. But there are just three additional children of Telem and Peggy to biograph. I have saved them until last since they led lives lacking drama and left no known descendants. And be careful about my use of the phrase "Final Three," which refers to the last three we are looking at, not the birth order. (Though the two are close. See Telem and Peggy.)

William Tapscott

Born in May 1850 and a laborer, William (“Billy”) led a rather unexciting life. He was single until about age 45 (41, according to the marriage record), when on 21 Oct 1895 in Fauquier Co, he married Mildred Smith. Mildred, was the 39-year-old widow of George A. Smith. Born c1852 to Harrison Smith, George had died of consumption on 7 Jan 1890 in Greenville, an African-American community that no longer exists, located between Marshall and Nokesville in Fauquier County. Mildred died soon after she and William were married. In the 1900 census, William was listed as widowed and was living with his brother Robert in Cedar Run Twp. He is not seen again. No evidence is found to indicate that either William or Mildred had any descendants.

Maggie Tapscott

Telem and Peggie’s last daughter was likely named “Margaret” but she is seen only as “Maggie” in two Fauquier County censuses, first as a child in 1860 with her parents and then in 1870 with some of her siblings following her parents’ deaths. Her ages in the two census records correspond to widely different birthyears, c1853 and c1849. We will use c1851 as her birthyear. Maggie is found in no additional records, probably owing to either an early death or to marriage with a name change.

George Tapscott

George, the final known child of Telem and Margaret, was probably born around 1853, an average from two Fauquier County census records. In 1870 George was a farm worker while living with his sister Nancy. George died in Fauquier County 9 Oct 1878 around age 25, still unmarried. He is said to have died of dyspepsia, but that is unlikely. He may, however, have died from whatever was causing the dyspepsia. George had no known descendants.

If I am wrong about no descendants of the final three (or anything else), please let me know.

And this ends our tale of the Coachman’s descendants, at least the early ones. This blog has named 47 early descendants and 32 spouses of those descendants. But my admittedly incomplete database has a total of 180 Plato descendants and 101 spouses. Some of them are among you readers and some will be attending this year’s Tapscott Family Reunion.

Of interest, however, is that only a few of Telem and Margaret's children left descendants living today. We know of descendants of Ann Virginia, Mary Frances, Elizabeth, and Nancy, but the other lines may have died out, or they may never have existed to begin with.

What we have seen so far, the Cundiff and Plato lines, are Tapscotts in name only (excluding some mixed-line descendants, of which there are probably many). Coming up next are genetic Tapscotts, descendants who inherited both the Tapscott name and the Tapscott genes.

Fauquier County Tapscotts - Nancy M. Tapscott

Nancy’s marker. (Find a Grave)

Telem and Margaret's daughter Nancy is first seen at age 14 (b c1846) in 1860 as a “Pearson” with her parents and siblings in what would become Cedar Run Distr. In 1870, she is found living in Cedar Run with four children, Hampton, Virginia (“Jennie”), Warner, and Margaret, all presumed to be her offspring. A fifth child, Robert Lee, born after the 1870 census, is also believed to be a child of Nancy because he is found in a later census living with Hampton, who is designated as his brother. Though all the children except Robert are found in the 1870 census living with their mother and having the name “Tapscott,” later in life they all used the name “Chichester.” And the reason may be obvious. They appear to have all been fathered by William Doddridge Chichester, a white neighbor, who we have seen before.

The evidence is good, though not absolute. “Drdge” (probably an abbreviation of “Doddridge”) is given as the father of Nancy’s first-born child, Hampton, in Hampton’s death record. Moreover, on 5 Sep 1869 William Chichester sold 33 acres of land to Nancy Tapscott for $500, and the deed of sale contains the following clause:

But if the said Nancy should hereafter be married and have children by such marriage, such children shall not take under this deed. It being the intention of the said Chichester that only such children as the said Nancy now has and such as she may hereafter have without marriage shall take the reversion under this deed.

William wanted to be sure that the land was passed on only to Nancy’s children that he had fathered, and to nobody else’s.

Nancy died on 14 Nov 1877 and was buried in Poplar Forks Baptist Church Cemetery with the name “Nancy M. Chichester.” Her marker has the oldest death date in the cemetery. Following Nancy’s death, her five children all moved to the District of Columbia, and later some moved on to Philadelphia. Many of her descendants were, or were married to, dressmakers and waiters.

Idlewile Hotel and Resort, 1897, where
Hampton worked. (Wikimedia Commons.)

The name of Nancy’s oldest child, Hampton, who was born around 1864, is shown with the middle initial “H” in a single record and with the name “Wade” in two city directories. That he was given the name “Hampton Wade” or converse is difficult to believe since Wade Hampton III (1818-1902) was an infamous slave-owning South Carolina plantation owner and politician who served as a Confederate general during the Civil War and had KKK connections during reconstruction. Hampton Chichester was living in DC as early as 1880, and lived there until at least 1899, at times with his brothers Warner and Robert Lee, his first cousin Robert J. Tapscott, son of Ann Virginia, and his second cousin James Tasco Tapscott, son of Cordelia. Around 1887, Hampton married a Virginia-born woman who we know only by her given name, “Alice E.” Around 1900 Hampton and Alice moved to Philadelphia, where for the next 25 years Hampton worked as head waiter at the Idlewild Hotel, near Media, Pennsylvania. Following Hampton’s sudden death on 3 Aug 1925 from a heart attack, the owner of the hotel said “We have lost a valuable man. He was esteemed by the patrons of the house.” Born around 1870, Alice had died five years earlier than Hampton, on 3 Jan 1920 in Philadelphia. Hampton and Alice left no known children.

Virginia Chichester, Nancy’s second child, was probably born around 1864, although birthyears calculated from Virginia’s age in various records vary widely. By 1885 Jennie, the name she often used, was living in DC and sewing for a living. Three years later, in DC, Virginia married William J. Lewis, a hotel waiter, born in Virginia in January 1860. The couple had two children, William J. Lewis Jr. and Genevieve Lee Lewis. William Sr. died 4 Jan 1933 and Virginia died 10 Jan 1939, both in DC.

Born c1866, Warner Crain Chichester moved to DC, where he married Marian B. Hunter in 1888. The couple had a single child, Carl Hampton Chichester, but Warner died quite young. After being judged a “lunatic” in 1894, Warner died around age 29 in DC on 17 Jul 1895, "after a long and painful illness". Marian, who remarried, died 30 Apr 1843 in Harrisburg, Pennsylvania.

Margaret (“Maggie”) M. Chichester, born c1867, ended up in DC like the rest of her siblings, and it may have been while living there that she married Andrew J. Corum. Born in January 1866,  Andrew’s middle name was likely “John” since he and Margaret had a son Andrew John Corum Jr. The Corums had at least twelve children, most of whom died young. On 1 Apr 1920, 21-year-old Andrew Jr. was shot to death by his fiancé "because he refused to keep his promise to marry her." Frances Spinner, the fiancé, was sentenced to 20 years in the penitentiary. Andrew Sr. died in DC on 31 Jul 1932, and Margaret died there on 17 Jan 1939, just a week after her sister Virginia had passed.

Nancy’s final known child, Robert Lee Chichester, was born in Fauquier County, probably on 28 Oct 1872, though his death certificate gives a year of 1875. In 1889 and 1890 he was living on DC with brothers, but by 1900 he was in Philadelphia. It was there that, on 2 Oct 1905, he married Estelle Freeman. The couple had one known offspring, Catherine, born c1911. Catherine is seen in only one record and apparently died as a child. Robert died on 22 Apr 1946 in Philadelphia. Estelle, who had been born in Philadelphia on 6 Oct 1873, died there on 14 Dec 1963. There is some evidence that Robert and Estelle did quite well financially, but that is another story.

Fauquier County Tapscotts - Elizabeth, Daughter of Telem and Peggy

One wonders if Elizabeth, daughter of Telem and Peggy, was named after her grandmother,  the progenitor of Fauquier County Tapscotts, Elizabeth Percifull Tapscott. 

Elizabeth first appears as 12-year-old “Elizabeth Pearson,” with her parents in the 1860 census and as 22-year-old “Elizabeth Tapscott” in the 1870 census for Cedar Run, where she is living with her brother Robert, and some other siblings, following the death of their parents. Then in 1880, she is seen as “Lizzie Tapscot,” living in the town of Warrenton. And she is said to be married, but where is her husband? In 1900, with a date of birth given as Feb 1848, Lizzie Tapscott is back in Cedar Run, where she now widowed with two children, William J. Tapscott and Mason Tapscott. But the record gives William’s and Mason’s birth dates as February 1870 and July 1874. Why then do they not appear in the 1880 census with Elizabeth? With a little work, we can find William, who, in 1880 at age 9, was a servant in a Fauquier County household. Perhaps, Elizabeth “farmed him out” so she could work elsewhere. But there is still no sign of Mason in 1880.

Gertrude Tapscott (posted on Ancestry
 by prestonmcleecarterbell.)

The 1900 census claims that Elizabeth is the mother of three living children. The third, it turns out, was Gertrude H. Tapscott, who married Hamilton Preston on 26 Jun 1889 in Fauquier Co and, when Hamilton died around 1907, married James Lewis Jasper in DC on 13 Sep 1911. The record of the first marriage gives Gertrudes’s mother as Elizabeth and her father as William, with no last name. Like her brother Mason, Gertrude, who was born in June 1873, should have appeared in the 1880 census, but did not.

Gertrude died in DC around 11 Sep 1912, leaving seven children. Her second husband, James, born 3 Jun 1875, died in DC on 14 Sep 1946.

Records provide a range of birth years for Mason Tapscott with an average of about 1875. Around 1900, Mason Tapscott married “Anna” (c1882–c1919) and had six known children. Mason is last seen as a widower in 1920, in Ellicott City, Maryland.

We have no idea of what became of Elizabeth’s son, William J. Tapscott. He is last seen living with his mother and his brother, Mason, in the 1910 census for the Cedar Run Distr.

Elizabeth died sometime between 1920, when she appears in the census for Cedar Run Distr, and 1930, when she is found in no census. 

Birthday gathering for Elizabeth Tapscott, who is seated directly behind the cake, c1920. Her grandson, William Mason Preston Sr., son of Gertrude and Hamilton Preston, is standing directly behind her. (Courtesy of Lisa Preston.)

I know that there are some descendants of Elizabeth out there and I am hoping to hear from you. Let me know of errors, disagreements, etc. And if you know anything about where Mason and Gertrude were at the time of the 1880 census or what became of William J., please let me know. And while we are at it, who was Gertrude’s father, William? There have been a multitude of guesses about William, but that is all they seem to be. Does anyone have proof of or at least evidence about William’s identity?