Showing posts with label Telem Tapscott. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Telem Tapscott. Show all posts

Sunday, January 15, 2023

Fauquier County Tapscotts - Telem's Estate

When Telem Plato died in 1863, he left a considerable estate—considerable considering the time and circumstances. He was, after all, the son of an enslaved coachman and Virginia was on the verge of rebellion, with plans to put Yankees and black people in their place.

The personal property inventory (household goods and furniture, farm implements, livestock) ran to four pages and its sale brought $974.12. According to the record of the 17 Mar 1866 estate sale, purchasers included Robt Plato, Ann V. Plato, Telem Plato, Mack Plato, Elisabeth Plato, and Nancy Plato. The Coachman’s grandchildren had taken, or been given, the surname “Plato,” at least for a while, though they would soon go back to “Tapscott.”

Combined with cash on hand of $11.00, the sale proceeds showed a value of $985.12 ($18,109 in 2022 dollars) for Telem Plato’s estate, excluding real estate. And Telem did have real estate, valued at $200 in 1860, which was presumably passed down to his children.


Monday, December 26, 2022

Fauquier County Tapscotts - Plato, the Coachman

And now we come to Elizabeth Percifull’s second line of descendants,

A Fauquier Tapscott family story relates that before her marriage to James Tapscott, Elizabeth Percifull had a child in Lancaster Co, Virginia with her father’s enslaved coachman “Plato.” In 1781, Elijah had but two slaves, Molly and Grace, no Plato. His 1814 will, mentions just three slaves, Judith, Daniel, Leroy. Again no name resembling that of the fabled coachman.

One might ignore this story of a coachman’s child,  but Elijah is known to have owned eleven unnamed slaves in 1810, and Plato could have been among them.  More important is that on 27 Feb 1832, a “Tellham Platoe” was registered in Fauquier County, a requirement for free Blacks. His age was given as twenty-one, corresponding to a birth year of 1810 or 1811, exactly what one might expect for a child of Elizabeth prior to her marriage. And he was said to be “born free.” Under Virginia law, the slave status of a child followed that of the mother (doctrine of partus sequitur ventrem). Offspring of Elizabeth would have been born free, whether the fathers were slaves or not. Perhaps most significant is that his descendants show DNA matches with Elizabeth’s known descendants. As a son of Elizabeth, “Tellham” would have lived with James and Elizabeth Tapscott as a child, taking James’s last name (on occasion).

Tellham used or was given numerous names during his life in Fauquier Co. Contemporary records show him with first names “Telem,” “Telum,” and “Tilum,” in addition to “Tellham.” And last names “Tapscott,” "Topscott," “Tapsco,” “Tapscon,” “Pearson,” and “Plato,”  in addition to “Platoe.” And we are omitting the obvious errors “Teland”  and “Caleb,” found in two documents.

Every year between 1835 and 1850 “Telum Tapsco” (“Telum Tapscon” in 1838) paid Fauquier Co taxes, much more often than any of Elizabeth’s other children. The taxes ranged from eight cents to thirty cents, always for one male over age sixteen and often for horses and mules, up to three. Telum Tapsco was doing well for himself, as will be seen.

In the 1840 Fauquier County census, “Tilum Topscott” is shown as the head of a household comprised of a man and woman, both aged 24 to 36 (birth year 1804 to 1811), and five children under 10 years old (three boys and two girls, birth year 1830 to 1840). The family, which appears in the census only one line away from Elizabeth Tapscott’s listing, also had two slaves, a case of Blacks owning Blacks. This was not uncommon. Sometimes the ownership was “benevolent” (to avoid the higher taxes faced by freed slaves) and sometimes it was strictly “commercial.” A death record for Telem the younger gives his parents as Telem (the  first name we will use) and Peggie Tapscott.

The elder Telem and his family is missing from the 1850 census, but he and his wife, “Peggy” (“Margaret Pinn” according to the death certificate for their daughter Ann Virginia), appear with their eleven children in the Fauquier Co census of 1860 with a surname change to “Pearson.” The name change was probably due to the the census enumerator recording the name he thought he heard from a client unable to check the spelling. Though the Pearson name was not uncommon in Fauquier Co we find no connection between the Pearsons and the Tapscotts, We know that the Pearson family in the 1860 census is the family of Telem Plato Tapscott because seven of the eleven “Pearson” children (Robert, Ann, Telem (Jr.), Mack (“Mac”), Elizabeth, William, Nancy, Maggie, and George) can be readily identified bearing the surname “Tapscott” in the 1870 Fauquier County census. Only Frances and Rodolph are not immediately apparent. The age of Telem “Pearson,” sixty-seven, in the census, corresponding to a birth year of about 1793, is almost certainly incorrect. Peggy’s birth year is 1814 or 1815 according to her age of forty-five in the 1860 census.

The congressional act of 4 July 1864 recognized the Federal Government’s debt to loyal citizens for property losses suffered during the Civil War and arranged reimbursement. At first claims were allowed only by northern states, but eventually, after animosity toward the south subsided, the act was extended to those southerners demonstrating Union loyalty. Following the death of their father in 1863 and their mother in 1865, Telem and Peggy’s children asked Robert R. Tompkins (a white farmer) to administer the estate of “Telem Plato Colored” and to file a claim for losses suffered during the Civil War. By the end of his life, Telem’s surname had been changed one more time, to “Plato,” likely what it had been originally and the name I have chosen to use. Not only is "Telem Plato" more interesting than "Telem Tapscott," its use avoids confusion between the younger and elder Telems.

In depositions, Telem the younger claimed that milk cows, sheep, oats, and corn had been taken by Union troops, some of them under the command of “Genl Blenker” (General Louis Blenker, who died in October 1863 of injuries he had received much earlier when he commanded troops in Warrenton, Fauquier County). The younger Telem’s brother Robert stated that

All our family were in favor of the Union during the war. My father was a strong Union Man. We all thought it would better for all colored people to have the north [unclear] and we were always glad when they did [unclear], The rebels forced some of us to work on the fortifications at Manassas when the war first broke out., but after that we all kept clear of them. One of my brothers, Rodolph went off with the Union Army and we all done all we could for the Union officers and soldiers…

As administrator, Robert Tompkins claimed $1,646, of which $582.50 was allowed.

In his deposition Robert Tapscott made a strange statement:

My father was a colored man and my mother was a white woman; and the children all go by the name of Tapscott because that was my mother’s name.

The only white Tapscotts known to be in Fauquier County around the time of Robert’s birth were Elizabeth Tapscott and her daughter Harriet. Elizabeth is believed to have been the mother of Telem Plato and Harriet, his half sister. We know of no white Peggy Tapscott in Fauquier County. It sounds like Robert was speaking of his grandparents, rather than his parents. Could we have it all wrong? Perhaps, but probably not.

What do you think?

Thursday, July 21, 2022

Fauquier County Tapscotts - Elizabeth''s Children, the Tapscott Lines

Elizabeth Percifull (c1790 - c1855) had a large number of male companions, both before and after her short marriage with James E. Tapscott, who died young, around age 30. Her many descendants comprise the Tapscotts of Fauquier Co, Virginia. Below is my working chart showing origins of the various lines. Is it correct? Probably not. That's why I call it a "working chart." There is very good evidence for the twins from her union with Richard Cundiff. Though we don't know what became of them. There is excellent evidence for Harriet being a daughter of James Tapscott, though many people believe otherwise. There is good DNA evidence for Robert Francis Tapscott being the son of a "Holder," though the evidence that it was Taliaferro Holder is weak. There is fair evidence for William Tapscott being a descendant of a "Phil Tapscott" though we know little about Phil, except that his birth name was almost certainly not "Tapscott." The other unions, particularly that involving Plato (who may not have even existed) are somewhat questionable. But this chart is a start. Now let's see if we can prove or disprove portions. Maybe we can name the "Unknown" partner, or more likely partners. But I need your help is doing so. Don't be afraid to criticize. I have very thick skin. But try to provide evidence. Trees produced by others without sources, are not evidence. And if you are a male descendant of Elizabeth or Harriett with the name "Tapscott," your yDNA might provide names or connections for the unknown(s).



Are you A Fauquier Co Tapscott descendant? Which is your line?

Sunday, January 13, 2013

Fauquier County Tapscotts

was contacted yesterday by someone who believes she is a descendant of Harriet Tapscott of Fauquier County Virginia, and who also had an Ancestry.com autosomal DNA test done as did I. Unfortunately we have not yet been notified of a match. Nevertheless matches are still being made and perhaps something will show up. I wrote her the following.

There are two Fauquier County Tapscotts with similar names—Harriott and Harriet.

Harriott Tapscott was a sister of James E. Tapscott and a daughter of Ezekiel Tapscott and Hannah H. George of Lancaster County. Ezekiel Tapscott was my 5th-great uncle.

Harriet Tapscott (courtesy of Monica Samowar).
Harriet Tapscott, on the other hand, was the daughter of Elizabeth Percifull and likely also of James Tapscott and the granddaughter of Ezekiel.

Harriott was my first cousin five times removed. Harriet was my second cousin four times removed. Harriet was the niece of Harriot. A lot of people have confused the two, but I have extremely strong evidence that they were different people, evidence I'll be glad to post.

To a large extent, the descendants of Harriet and her mother Elizabeth Percifull populated Fauquier County with Tapscotts. This is probably accepted by everyone. Thus perhaps excepting some recent arrivals, the Fauquier County Tapscotts of mixed race are descended through mixed-gender lines. This means that only mtDNA or autosomal DNA tests can be used. We can pretty well rule out the use of yDNA (though we might get a surprise).

A larger problem is that any descendants of Elizabeth (Percifull) Tapscott who were not also descendants of her husband James have no known Tapscott gene connection. This is a problem because Elizabeth is known to have had descendants who were not fathered by James but who, in most cases, were given the surname "Tapscott." Before she married James, a Lancaster County court case showed that Elizabeth had two illegitimate white children, whose fate is unknown, fathered by Richard Cundiff. But of much greater importance here, Elizabeth is also believed to have had the following children of mixed race who ended up in Fauquier County—Telem, Catherine, William, Jackson, and Edmond Abraham, all of whom were given the last name "Tapscott."  In fact Harriett is likely the only child of both James and Elizabeth, who were married only a short time, six years or less. In court Elizabeth claimed that Harriet was a child of James and Harriet did receive land based on that claim. If that is true then Harriet's descendants through her children—Cordelia ("Delia") and Maria—should show autosomal DNA matches to Tapscotts related to Ezekiel. The problem is that Elizabeth may have been lying about Harriet in order for Harriet to obtain land from James's service during the War of 1812. (The whole land thing is still confusing.)

If we can find some autosomal matches between Fauquier County Tapscotts believed to be descendants of Harriet and Tapscotts related to Ezekiel of Lancaster County (I am presumably one) then we have evidence that Harriet was indeed James's daughter. I would very much like to see this happen. If we find no matches (after really trying) this indicates that Harriet was not a child of James (but also adds proof to Harriott and Harriet being separate people).

One other possibility is to look for mtDNA matches through female lines between Fauquier County Tapscotts and descendants of Elizabeth (Percifull) Tapscott's sisters, and there were a lot of them—at least seven, daughters of Elijah Perciful. A match would lend weight to the connection to Elizabeth Percifull though not to James or Ezekiel. Of course tracing female lines would be quite difficult owing to the name changes.