A recent blog concluded that Sam and Susie Tapscott had four children, three girls (Viola, Julia, and Stella) and a boy (Austin). But then ended with
Wednesday, September 9, 2020
Wabash Valley Tapscotts - Frank and Harry Tapscott
Thursday, September 3, 2020
Wabash Valley Tapscotts - A Photo
The last blog showed a photo of Samuel with his son and three daughters sent me by cousin Cheryl. The photograph is a little blurred with age making it difficult to estimate children’s ages, and thus the photo date. I decided to try to “improve” the photo by, in turn, enhancing, sharpening, colorizing it. The first and last were done using features available on the My Heritage website. I sharpened it using Microsoft editing. And then I combined all of these variations.
From the photo “improved” with everything, my wife and I think that the boy, presumably
Austin, was aged 9 or 10 and the youngest girl, Stella, at the far right, 12 or
13. This means that the photo was taken around 1890 or 1891. The photo also
shows that the seated girl has a somewhat rounded face, in contrast to the
taller girl standing behind her. Other photos show Viola to have a rounded
face, indicating that the seated girl is Viola. And Viola would be expected to
be seated owing to the injury to leg caused by Samuel. What do you think?
![]() |
| Original |
![]() |
| Enhanced |
![]() |
| Sharpened |
![]() |
| Colorized |
![]() |
| Everything |
Friday, August 28, 2020
Wabash Valley Tapscotts - Sam and Susie’s Kids
The preceding blog stated that unknowns surround Susie Bell (Tingley) Tapscott Sturdevant, but more mysteries may surround her children.
First, we don’t know with certainty how many children Susie and Samuel had. The 1880 census shows three, “Lully,” “Maria,” and “Susan,” All born in the 1870s. But no Samuel Tapscott family unit appears in a census after that date.
“Lully’ it turns out was Viola Jane, “Lully” apparently being a nickname (or a mistake by the census enumerator). She was also known as “Lola.” We are quite familiar with Viola’s life. She was born 23 Aug 1875 (apparently out of wedlock), married 1 May 1898, and died 19 Apr 1973.
“Maria” was Julia Maria, who was born in 1876 or 1877 and was probably the “infant child, as yet unborn” that resulted in Susie’s marriage to Samuel on 8 Jul 1876. Julia committed suicide in 1898 by jumping in front of a train. All about that in my book.
The third child in the census is Susan, age 1 (born between 2 Jun 1878 and 1 Jun 1879). An 1879 issue of the Clark County Herald announced “BORN. TAPSCOTT-In Marshall, May 31, to Samuel and Susie Tapscott-a daughter” and a birth record at the Clark County Courthouse records the birth of a girl named only “Tapscott” to Samuel and Susan Tingley Tapscott. We have always assumed those records were for Susan who appears in the 1880 census. And they are. But then we have a problem. According to her death certificate, Estella Tapscott, who went almost solely by “Stella,” was born to Sam and Susie on 23 May 1879, a date that appears on Stella’s grave marker and fits the age on her marriage record. But we cannot have two children born eight days apart. Moreover if Stella had been born 23 May 1879 she should appear in the 1880 census with her family. Even if her date of birth was May 1880, as appears in the 1900 census, she should still show up in the 1880 census, which has an official date of Jun 1. And, as we will see, the birth record for her brother Austin states that he is child number 4, not number 5 which would be the case if he had both a sister Susan and a sister Stella. The evidence allows one to conclude that Stella does appear in the 1880 census, but as “Susan.” It is likely that the daughter we know as “Stella’ was really “Susan Estella” or “Estella Susan” and was really born 31 May 1878 as given in the more reliable birth record, not 23 May 1879, a date probably promulgated by human error. (Birth dates on death certificates and grave markers are often questionable.)
Finally, there is Austin T. Tapscott, found in only a single record, a reliable birth record at the Clark Co, Illinois courthouse. The record gives the date of birth as 23 Sep 1881 and states that he is fourth child born to “Sarah Tabscot nee Tingley” and “Samuel Tapscot.” No other record of Austin has been found and it is likely that he died young.
An 1884 article in a Terre Haute newspaper states that during a dispute between Samuel and his wife, she had absconded with two children leaving Sam with two others. Four total. And a photograph, from cousin Cheryl, taken around 1890 or 1891 (my estimation) shows Samuel with four children, three girls and a boy. It all seems to fit together. Samuel and Susie Bell had four children: Viola Jane, Julia Maria, Estella Susan (“Stella”), and Austin T. But, as you will soon see,
We May Be Wrong!
![]() |
| Samuel, Julia, Viola, Austin, Stella, c1890-1891, thanks to Cheryl Naegel. |
Sunday, August 23, 2020
Wabash Valley Tapscotts - The Mysteries of Susie
I hate to give up when it comes to tracing Susie Bell Tingley and her children (see blog 22 Jan 2018). But I may have to. Susan (“Susie”) Bell (likely “Corabelle” or “Corabell”) married the last-born of Henry and Susan (Bass) Tapscott’s children—the scoundrel Samuel. Once I finish with Samuel Tapscott and his descendants, the book “Henry’s Children, the Tapscotts of the Wabash Valley” will be complete. (Except for a month or two of editing and indexing.) But, I’m afraid I may have to write Samuel and Susie’s section with some rather large gaps. Let’s start with Susie.
| Susie Bell (thanks to Cheryl Naegel) |
The biggest problem with Susan (Tingley) Tapscott is that she disappears for over thirty years. Except for a postcard that my distant cousin Cheryl Naegel (a cornucopia of information) sent me, no document is found with her name between 1894, when “Bell Fingley” (transcription error) gave permission for her daughter Estella Tapscott to marry, and Susie's death on 3 Dec 1930 at her daughter’s home in Burnett, Vigo Co, Indiana. She cannot be found in the 1900, 1910, 1920, or 1930 censuses, or anywhere else for that matter.
We do know, from the postcard and death certificate, that she married someone by the name of “Sturdevant” (presumably following Samuel’s death on 15 Jun 1903). But, unfortunately, we don’t know her spouse’s first name. All attempts to find the correct Susan (or Susie) Sturdevant in other records have failed.
We also know, from the postcard, that she was living in Decatur, Illinois in 1927. What is interesting is that in 1920, living in Danville, was a Susan Sturdevant born in 1855 (our Susie’s birth year) married to an Andrew Sturdevant. Wrong Susan as it turns out.
Can anybody tell me
anything about Susie's missing years?
The next blog will look at Susie’s children, some even more mysterious than their mother.
Monday, January 22, 2018
Wabash Valley Tapscotts - Susie Bell Tingley
Monday, September 14, 2015
Clark County Tingleys
![]() |
| The third Clark County Courthouse in Marshall (1837-1889) was the site for both
marriage and arraignments for Samuel.
|
All geneological data reported in these blogs are based on primary and/or reputable secondary sources, or transcriptions thereof, and never on online trees. Contact the author to request sources, which have been omitted here to improve readability.
Sunday, September 13, 2015
Samuel's Saga, Continued
![]() |
| Samuel was confined at Southern Illinois Penitentiary, now |
![]() |
| Registry of prisoners incarcerated at Southern Illinois Penitentiary, Vol. 1, p. 165 ( State of Illinois Digital Archives). |
All genealogical data reported in these blogs are based on primary and/or reputable secondary sources, or transcriptions thereof, and never on online trees. Contact the author to request sources, which have been omitted here to improve readability.
Thursday, June 25, 2015
Samuel Tapscott
The day of the attack, Sam had
gone to Terre Haute to visit his sister and brother-in-law Frances Ann and
Samuel Lockard and his sister-in-law Mary Ann (Lockard) Tapscott, widow of
Samuel’s brother Jacob, who had been killed a couple of years earlier in a
Crawford County, Illinois, incident (28 May 2013 blog). Mary Ann Lockard and
Samuel Lockard were brother and sister and had married a Tapscott brother and
sister. On that fateful day, Samuel Tapscott went out in his sister's yard,
which faced an alley, and encountered a neighbor, Alexander Thompson (“Alex”),
who had gone out to his stable to milk his cow. Although the two had apparently
never met before, they became involved in a heated argument, yelling according
to observers, “What the hell are you doing here?” “None
of your damned business.” “Get out of the alley you drunken scamp.” “I won't do
it, and I don't want any of your jaw.” “Let me kill the damn son of a bitch.” “Let
me go; I will kill any God damn man that calls me a damn son of a bitch, or
strikes me, or strikes at me first.” But witnesses, several of whom were
relatives of Alexander and Samuel, were unable or unwilling to say who said
what to whom or who started the row. The argument ended violently with a single blow to Alexander's head and face with a spade. At that point, Samuel and possibly others, ran down the alley. One cannot help but wonder whether Samuel's brother-in-law was involved, though this was never suggested.
About 10 o’clock that night Samuel
Tapscott was arrested attempting to leave town on a west-bound train. Former Terre
Haute Chief of Police Daniel Crowe, who made the arrest, asked Samuel if his
name was “Tapscott.” Samuel responded “No.” Daniel replied, “You are probably
the man I want.” Samuel was jailed in Terre Haute with a bail of $2000, which was raised to
$5000 a couple of weeks later. And then Alexander did the unthinkable, he died.
On 14 Mar 1871 a Vigo County grand jury brought in an indictment against Samuel
Tapscott of first degree murder.
Samuel languished in jail while continuances
and postponements pushed dates for hearings further and further into the future.
Month after month local newspapers announced trial dates, only to have the
notices retracted. On 1 Nov 1871, the Terre
Haute Weekly Express declared “The question is often asked when will
Tapscott be tried for the murder of Alex. Thompson? He has now lain in jail
eight months, at a heavy expense to the county.” On 4 Nov 1871 the Terre Haute Saturday Evening Mail covered
all bases by announcing “We have positive assurance that Tapscott will be tried
next week, unless the case is again postponed. This can be relied upon.” The
case was postponed. Finally, on Thu 23 Nov, trial commenced.
![]() |
The Vigo County Courthouse in Terre Haute, site of the
Tapscott trial (Judson McCranie, Wikimedia Commons).
|
Sunday, September 7, 2014
Notorious
![]() |
| 77-year-old Omer walks up the Coles County courthouse steps for a preliminary hearing on a murder charge (Decatur Herald, Decatur, Illinois, Fri 24 Apr 1959, p. 4.) |
![]() |
Menard Penitentiary (now Menard Correction Center),
Chester, Illinois, Omer’s temporary residence (2010).
|
Tuesday, May 28, 2013
The death of Jacob Tapscott
"Jake" Tapscott lived for a while in or near Hutsonville, Crawford County Illinois, immediately south of Clark County. Another member of the community was Judge Steers, John W. Steers a wealthy farmer and an important man in the community. In 1868, the house of Judge Steers was robbed and evidence pointed to a disreputable group of relatives and hangers-on headed by Old Jim Lane. The "gang" was arrested but several posted bond and were released. The local community called on a group of regulators, some say a "posse," others "vigilantes," to rid the county of these suspected miscreants. On 8 Aug 1868 the "posse" walked into Jim Lane's house, where a gunfight ensued. Jacob Tapscott, a "posse" member, was hit by a bullet (some say fired by Old Jim Lane) and died instantly. He was only 32 (or so). His widow, Mary Lockard moved to nearby Terre Haute to find work to support her four children.
Young Jim Lane was also killed in the gunfight and his father, seriously wounded. The posse panicked realizing that they had no warrant and left with Jake Tapscott's body. For some time afterward Old Jim Lane, who recovered from his wounds, sought justice to avenge his son's death from what he considered to be mob action, but to no avail. Lawyers, worried about their standing in Crawford County, refused to take the case. A couple of years later, a lone horseman rode into Annapolis, a small settlement near the scene of the gunfight, dismounted, and walked among the few buildings. After a short time, Old Jim Lane (for that is who it was) remounted and rode away, never to be seen again. Although the Lane family had likely committed the robbery of Judge Steers, the action taken by the enforcers was unjustified and for Jacob Tapscott, it was disastrous.
Illinois was surprisingly rough back then. Jacob Tapscott had a brother Samuel, a scalawag and an accused murderer. But more on him later.













